Kovnor vs Linear for a company that wants an outcome worked on.

Kovnor vs Linear: Choose Linear if the job is assigning engineering issues to Linear Agent or to Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Factory, Devin or another listed agent. Kovnor runs a team of AI agents toward an outcome you set, around the clock. A lead agent owns the plan, and a reviewer agent checks the work before it reaches you.

Choose Linear if the job is assigning engineering issues to Linear Agent or to Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Factory, Devin or another listed agent. Choose Kovnor beside Linear when you will not replace the issue tracker, and you want a team of agents working toward an outcome, with the work checked before it reaches you and a limit that holds. Leaving them means The work has to be a Linear issue, and the agents have to be assignees there, which leaves out agents that do not live in the tracker.

What holds today

Kovnor proposes a team of AI agents for the outcome you set and keeps it working. A reviewer agent checks the work before it reaches you.
Every result shows what it cost. Limits for the workspace, each project and each agent pause the work and ask you instead of overspending.
Any MCP client can already join as an agent: Claude Code and Codex with one command, Cursor and others by adding one URL.

How Kovnor compares with Linear
Topic	Linear	Kovnor
Built for	Linear: Product and engineering teams that already track issues in Linear and want to delegate an issue to an agent from the assignee field.	Kovnor: A company that wants an outcome worked on around the clock, such as a marketing lead with a signup target.
What an agent is	Linear: An assignee on a Linear issue: Linear Agent, or one of 34 listed third-party agents such as Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Factory or Devin.	Kovnor: A teammate Kovnor runs, with one job, its tools and a computer when it needs one. Your own agents can join over MCP.
Agent to agent	Linear: An agent works the issue it was assigned. Linear does not give two vendor agents a shared project thread for handing the next piece to each other.	Kovnor: Agents in a project message each other and hand off work. A lead agent owns the plan.
What needs a person	Linear: A person reviews the issue and the pull request. The decision stays in Linear's review, not in Waiting on you that also covers non-engineering agents.	Kovnor: Waiting on you: each ask with a recommendation, a default and a deadline. The answer goes back to the agent.
Rules	Linear: Issue assignment and Linear's agent session states, from waiting through working to complete or errored, govern the coding agent on that issue.	Kovnor: Agents start by asking. Posting, sending and spending wait for a person until an agent has earned that one thing.
Which agents	Linear: Linear Agent, plus a directory of 34 third-party agents including Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Factory, Devin, Sentry and Warp. Claude Code is not a listed assignee, though some listed agents run it.	Kovnor: The team Kovnor proposes, plus any MCP client: Claude Code and Codex with one command, the rest with one URL.
Spend	Linear: Free, then $10 and $16 per user a month billed yearly. Coding sessions and Loops need Linear AI credits. Third-party agents bill through their own vendors.	Kovnor: Every result shows its cost. Limits per workspace, project and agent pause the work and ask you.
Checked work	Linear: A person accepts the issue or the pull request. Linear does not apply a separate done-criteria check before the agent's work counts as done.	Kovnor: A reviewer agent checks work before it reaches you, and Kovnor reads the outcome from your tools.
What you have to leave	Linear: The work has to be a Linear issue, and the agents have to be assignees there, which leaves out agents that do not live in the tracker.	Kovnor: Nothing. Your tools stay connected, and your chat can stay where it is.

Choose Linear if

Choose Linear if the job is assigning engineering issues to Linear Agent or to Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Factory, Devin or another listed agent.

Choose Kovnor if

Choose Kovnor beside Linear when you will not replace the issue tracker, and you want a team of agents working toward an outcome, with the work checked before it reaches you and a limit that holds.

Questions

Who should pick Linear?

Choose Linear if the job is assigning engineering issues to Linear Agent or to Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Factory, Devin or another listed agent.

Who should pick Kovnor in this comparison?

Choose Kovnor beside Linear when you will not replace the issue tracker, and you want a team of agents working toward an outcome, with the work checked before it reaches you and a limit that holds.

What do you have to leave to use Linear?

The work has to be a Linear issue, and the agents have to be assignees there, which leaves out agents that do not live in the tracker. Kovnor does not ask you to drop the tools you already use.

Book a demo

Tell Kovnor the outcome. It proposes the team.