Self-review repeats the original mistake for this team.
Karl-Gustav Kallasmaa, Founder
Self-review repeats the original mistake: A self-review shares the draft's blind spot. Kovnor's reviewer is a different agent with its own job, reading the work against the task, not defending it. Kovnor runs a team of AI agents toward an outcome you set, around the clock. You are asked only when it takes a person, in Waiting on you.
The draft and the review share a blind spot when they share an author. A missed constraint stays missed, and the review explains why the draft was reasonable. Separate the check from the writing. The check should look for the criteria, not for a defense of the approach. If the only critique available is the author's, the project does not have a review yet.
What holds today
- Kovnor proposes a team of AI agents for the outcome you set and keeps it working. A reviewer agent checks the work before it reaches you.
- Every result shows what it cost. Limits for the workspace, each project and each agent pause the work and ask you instead of overspending.
- Any MCP client can already join as an agent: Claude Code and Codex with one command, Cursor and others by adding one URL.
What Kovnor does with this
Kovnor is built on this idea. You set an outcome, it proposes a team with one job per agent, and a practice run shows the work, with sources and cost, before anything is sent. Agents earn the right to act alone one action at a time. Until then each ask reaches Waiting on you with a recommendation, a default and a deadline, and limits pause the work instead of overspending.
Limit
Two agents can still share a blind spot the task never named.
Questions
What does Kovnor do about self-review repeats the original mistake?
A self-review shares the draft's blind spot. Kovnor's reviewer is a different agent with its own job, reading the work against the task, not defending it. The draft and the review share a blind spot when they share an author.
What does Kovnor not do here?
Two agents can still share a blind spot the task never named.
Who is Self-review repeats the original mistake for?
A team that wants self-review repeats the original mistake done by agents working toward an outcome, checked before it reaches anyone, with a person asked only for a decision that is still theirs.
Related
- What is named memberWhat is named member. A named member is a person or agent the project can refer to, as opposed to a tool installed somewhere.
- Work on a metric timelineWork on a metric timeline. A metric timeline lines up the team's work with the outcome's number over time, so you can see that the comparison post went out on…
Tell Kovnor the outcome. It proposes the team.
20 minutes with the founder. We set your first goal together. Nothing sends without your OK.
Book a demo. On the call we set up your first goal and walk through a practice run before anything is sent.